The Things They Carried. Page 174-175, Written Commentary

The Important Things They Brought. Page 174-175, Composed Commentary

The Important Things They Carried. Page 174-175, Composed Commentary Many individuals ask themselves who is to blame for deaths in war, and if it is subjective to an individual, or if it is contextual. In the following extract from Tim O’Brien’s “The important things They Brought”, it is difficult to believe almost the Vietnam War as situational reason for the death of many, the reader has to see the war person by person, everyone or situation differing from each other. Right after the death of Kiowa, the males go looking for his body, as an indication of regard, throughout their search lots of ponder with agonizing thoughts.

O’Brien shows in this extract the way that diction and context can depict hope, seclusion, and blame.” […] how for a 2nd the flashlight had made Billie’s face sparkle” (Line 9) In the 2nd paragraph of the extract, the specific word “sparkle” is a particular word since it is not something that evokes any describing words of the scenarios throughout war, or for individuals who are participating in it. In numerous senses it brings a feeling of innocence, pleasure, and hope.

Hope, joy, and innocence would not generally be viewed as something that a person who remains in the war is comprised of, thinking about the scenarios, it would be anticipated that the diction would be one to describe a strong, hard man. The idea of hope being brought up is also very quickly eliminated, in numerous methods representing how war works. How things can change in an instant, without cautioning or without a possibility. Soldiers have brief hope, and in seconds it can be become fear, death or murder.

In this extract both hope and innocence are raised discreetly by the use of diction, it is revealed again with the undertone of the word “young boy” which is the manner in which the particular soldier is described. “Kid” as a describing word of a soldier shows the purity and the humanity of him, while also insinuating weakness. The absence of diction is likewise to be kept in mind since this specific character stays unnamed, since in reality he is nobody in the war but another soldier who devoted an error jeopardizing his life or lots of other lives.

He stays unimportant due to the fact that blame is unneeded during war; O’Brien shows the reader that blame is unreasonable in war because death is based upon luck. The pointer that the soldier is younger assists the reader understand that he does not yet comprehend war, nor does he understand that there is no blame, not even on him. In one minute things can change, from one minute to another somebody could die. Jimmy Cross discovers himself considering reason, letting himself be taken entirely by his ideas, “Eyes closed, he let himself go deeper into the waste, just letting the field take him”(Line 17).

The problem that Jimmy Cross brings bigger than all the others in his crew is regret, as being the leader indicates that the weight of regret is constantly there, inevitably. For some time, Jimmy Cross finds himself remembering his life prior to the war, where he resided in “a world without duty” (Line 39), which includes living easy life and playing golf, where his most significant concern is whether he’s going to score the very first hole or not, the author uses this to reveal the distinction between Lieutenant Cross’s truth prior to the war, and the truth that he has to handle in the present.

O’Brien brings the concern of contextual blame by utilizing examples of various circumstances to provide a point of view of why everyone must be blamed. Making use of circumstance for value of the deaths of soldiers or particularly Kiowa, demonstrates how war affects different individuals in different methods, the result of the death of a soldier in this case is subjective to circumstance. “You could blame the people [. who were tired by the daily body counts” A male living his life while reading the news article about a few dead soldiers will not be filled with guilt that he isn’t among the soldiers defending his nation, he will continue his day with little to no ideas about the discomfort other endure since of a war. Is society’s ignorance to be blamed for the deaths of soldiers? The consistent, blunt, examples of various contexts make the reader question their own viewpoint.

In this extract O’Brien manages to show how guilt can separate a person, Jimmy Cross is drifting in his own guilt and concern. Kiowa is another body that Lt. Cross should carry on his back while he bulges up the mountains. The use of context and diction demonstrate how scenario changes whatever, in the world beyond war there is wish to endure to tomorrow even with errors, in the war there is no pure, long lasting hope, because enduring is based on luck.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar