“The Hunger Games” by Suzanne Collins and the narrative “The Lottery game” by Shirley Jackson both illustrate the threats of blindly following ritualized practices and customs. The stories involve making use of an institutionalised drawing system, one which is utilized to blindly select a sacrifice for the particular societies. “The Appetite Games” utilizes a system entitled, the reaping, which is utilized to choose 2 adolescents to take part in a gladiatorial battle to the death. Similarly, in “The Lotto,” the lottery system enables a town to single out a sacrifice that is subsequently stoned. Both systems make use of a mix of state of mind and dialogue, references to the chaos prior to the order, and the characterization of authority figures to depict the results of communities thoughtlessly sending to the practices of tradition. The outcomes of these systems are that individual members of that neighborhood are made to bear the repercussions.
In both stories, the societies deal with the lotto and the reaping with an attitude of deference and veiled apprehension. The mood surrounding these occasions shows the communities’ sensations of anxiety toward the ceremonies, regardless of evident hesitation to change them. In each story, the authors develop a foreboding state of mind through the disposition and discussion of the characters. Characters joke before the events, however slowly become more solemn as the drawings get closer. In “The Cravings Games,” Windstorm and Katniss laugh while they simulate the ceremony and its leader Effie Trinket. However, Katniss notes that they just joke “because the option is to be scared out of your wits” (6 ).
Similarly, the townspeople in “The Lotto” smile and make small talk, “speaking of planting and rain” (1 ). This nervous attitude becomes progressively solemn as the ceremonies approach, and is implied to act as a veil for the underlying sensations of fear towards what the gaining and lottery game represent, the concept of impending sacrifice and death for individuals chosen. In both stories, the responses of the characters toward the rules of the services show that they are extremely acquainted with the rites of the traditions. In “The Lottery game,” the townspeople are contented throughout the reading of the instructions, “had done it many times that they only half listened” (3 ). The repeating of this guarantees that they have internalized its rituals. In “The Appetite Games,” the mayor also reads “the very same story every year” at the enjoying, and all of the members of the neighborhood recognize with the history of the Games and the back story, in addition to the rituals of the event itself. In the stories, characters all share a comparable sensation of fear toward the routines, but the occasions are so institutionalized that nobody attempts to question them. In
each story, authority figures use referrals to past chaos to highlight why rituals are important in maintaining order and preventing backsliding. Old Male Weaver works as this figure for the townspeople in “The Lottery,” and he keeps in mind that if institutions like the lotto were not in location, they might go back to an uncivilized lifestyle, and go back to “residing in caverns” (4 ). His validation is that “there has actually constantly been a lottery game,” and he relies solely on the foundations of the importance of custom to support his claims (4 ). Likewise, in “The Appetite Games,” the mayor mentions the “Dark Days” and the condition of the uprisings before the implementation of the Appetite Games (16 ). The referrals to past turmoil serve to highlight how figures of authority use fear to manipulate a collective into blindly following customs rather than thinking for themselves. In
both stories, the characterization of authority figures linked to the rituals shows how the societies have actually come to accept the control that these figures and corresponding organizations have over them. In “The Lotto,” the authority figure is Mr. Summers, who acts as a representative for the function. Jackson describes him as jovial, however makes it clear that the townspeople pity him, due to the fact that his wife is a nag. Regardless of this, Mr. Summers also “appeared extremely proper and essential” as he satisfies his task, which highlights how the town views the value of the lottery game. This significance is connected to Mr. Summers, who gets authority through association (2 ). Likewise, in“The Appetite Games,” Effie Trinket, the Capitol’s liaison to the enjoying, is “brilliant and bubbly” in such a way that makes her appear absurd (17 ). However, her involvement in the gaining ensures that the community will not question her function in the event or her status. In the stories, the characters who are chosen in the illustrations, Mrs. Hutchinson in “The Lottery game” and Katniss and Peeta in “The Appetite Games,” fall beyond the realm of authority, and as a result, their communities blindly accept their fates, and their practically definite death sentences. In
” The Lotto” and “The Appetite Games” Shirley Jackson and Suzanne Collins, respectively, use mood and dialogue, referrals to condition prior to the ceremonies, and the characterization of authority figures to show the repercussions of communities blindly sending to routines. In both narratives, specific members of these societies are required to withstand the horrific results of the lottery and the gaining, since their societies thoughtlessly accept the importance of custom, and their own hesitation and powerlessness in prompting change.