“The Count of Monte Cristo” by Alexandre Dumas Essay

The word revenge is specified in the dictionary as: ‘get fulfillment by intentionally triggering injury in return for an individual or oneself suffering’. Federal governments and nations typically retaliate by fighting, like with after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor the U.S federal government provided an order to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki as vengeance. Kings and totalitarians likewise retaliate by attacking other nations, and even the regular individuals, like us, take revenge on smaller issues. But is it ethically warranted? The response to this question is largely depends upon whom you ask, and it might vary according to the principles and worths that he/her was raised on– it differs among various peoples, cultures and customs.

In this essay I will attempt to answer this concern from the point of the story The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas. In order to go over the revenge issue of this book let us begin by a quick summery of the story.

Edmond Dantes, a young sailor, gets a benefit to be a Captain of a ship, however regrettably four males organized that he will be sent to prison for a criminal offense he did not dedicate. The four males are Danglars, Villefort, Fernand Mondego, and Caderousse. Dantes has invested fourteen years in prison and after that he got away with a buddy that taught him lots of things and gave him a map to a treasure. The good friend (Abbe) died, and when Dantes discovers the treasure he becomes rich and popular and is referred to as The Count Of Monte Cristo. Throughout all of this duration he didn’t stop thinking about revenging his enemy. He just waited for the ideal time and now it came. His mission is to revenge the people who imprisoned him and help individuals who helped him.

The Count Of Monte Cristo’s opinion about vengeance and death is that people who made other individuals suffer for a long time should not die quick, simply put you do not just eliminate them, you abuse them so that they will die gradually and painfully. Dantes desires them to be miserable and provide a hard time for an extended period of time similar to he suffered for a long time in jail. That is why he did not hire anybody to eliminate his enemies or eliminate them himself.

This is shown in the following quote that The Count Of Monte Cristo said: ‘If a man has tortured and killed your father, your mother, your sweetie, one of those beings who leave an eternal emptiness and a constantly bleeding wound when they are torn from your heart … do you think society has given you enough reparation due to the fact that the man who made you undergo long years of psychological and psychological suffering has gone through a few seconds of physical pain? For sluggish, profound, unlimited, and eternal suffering. I ‘d try to avenge myself by causing comparable suffering-an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth’. This last sentence in the quote, is a sentence from the bible and I think that by informing us this, the author wishes to show us that even in old time, in a book that suppose to teach us about life, vengeance was taken and was not unethical. This sentence also works as well as a reason for him to carry out his revenge strategies.

Monte Cristo was very smart. He tried to find the powerlessness of everyone of whom he wanted to take revenge of, and there he struck. He found out a lot about his opponents after he got away from jail. For instance we understand that Danglars likes money, so Monte Cristo scheduled him to have no cash, he destroyed him economically. Another example is Fernand Mondego’s case. After Fernand reaches a high position and became Count de Morcerf, Monte Cristo informed the general public that Morcerf is a traitor, and by this act he wrecked him socially. We also gained from the story, about Morcerf’s love and dedication to his household. This was another target for Monte Cristo and he prospered in separating him from his family. Fernand was so unpleasant that he devoted suicide.

Villffort, for my viewpoint is the most egoist individual I have ever heard of (although he is fictional). He would do anything and sacrifice anybody to his desire. One Quote in the book even stated so: ‘I would compromise anything to my aspiration, even my own daddy’. Due to the fact that of his political yearning, Villfort was eager to have an innocent guy put behind bars for a whole life time. I believe that in this case revenge is really ethically warranted, because for a guy such as Villefort, who wanted to put an innocent man in jail, then vengeance is very ethically warranted. Danglars framed Dantes (composed the letters), since he was envy and jealous at him due to the fact that he gets the reward to be the captain of the Pharon (ship), and also at his spirit and self self-confidence Dantes had.

I think that it is really apparent why Mondego framed Dantes. He was jealous of Dantes Bride-to-be, Mercedes. Gaspard Caderousse, was to greedy. Monte Cristo actually offered Caderousse a chance to change and end up being truthful, however Caderousee didn’t. He was eliminated while trying to rob the Count’s house. But Dantes was not revenging all the time he was a moral, good, and generous individual. For example when the Abbe was passing away, Dantes did not desert him. Which reveals us that Edmond Dantes is an excellent man.

As we can see, Monte Cristo took his vengeance in a manner that didn’t involve any act that was prohibited. I think that vengeance is ethically warranted in this specific story, because he did suffer a great deal, and there was an excellent factor for his revenge. In every day life retaliating is rather childish, but not taking it is surrendering. In my viewpoint vengeance ought to be taken, and a person needs to be penalized for a bad thing he did. The power of revenge is discovered in everyone of us, however we all have to understand how to utilize it wisely.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar