Oedipus The King: Existence Of Man
Because the beginning of time, guy has used numerous approaches on which to pass down stories, beliefs, and myths which describe various elements of life. From oral tradition, to pictographs, to clay tablets, and onto paper, all make up the world of literature. Literature has constantly been a limitless realm of ideas, morals, and trains of idea. Although the sphere of literature is surrounded with severe variety of thought, its core is focused on one theme: male. All literature carries with itself 3 primary qualities: it is composed by male, for man, and about male.
Oedipus the King, the terrific Greek disaster by the unequaled theorist, Sophocles, is no exception to literature’s domain. It deals with one king, Oedipus, and his predicament to avenge the death of his predecessor, King Laios. In his identified search to find the murderer, he establishes a proclamation which would require the banishment and even the death of the killer. In his paradoxical action, the reader finds that this killer that Oedipus is so figured out to discover is none besides Oedipus himself.
In adhesion to the definition of literature, this terrible plot eveals to the reader 3 primary commentaries about the nature of male: male can not leave his past, pride is the sin which leads man to higher evils, and although the life of guy is in itself a positive excellent, there will constantly be a shadow of terrible catastrophe that falls across it. All throughout literature, lots of works have actually depicted characters who carry with them a dark and dismal past, and try to tear this outrageous history of their lives from the books of their life.
Regrettably, this is difficult due to the truth that the past is a precursor to today which, in turn, etermines one’s future. It is one’s past that makes one what he or she is today. For example, if an individual dedicated callous acts such as theft or murder, was not captured by the law, and later on realizes that particular element of his or her life has actually caused them terrific grief and regret, he or she will make the effort to alter and become a brand-new individual. Let us state that individual becomes one who appreciates the well-being of others and takes social action versus the injustices of society.
This specific became what she or he is today since of n incident which occurred in his of her past. This “catching up” of the previous need not constantly be negative and be portrayed as some type of vengeance infringed upon the individual perhaps due to a repellent occurrence in the past, but the past will constantly effect the future and its toll is inescapable. As declared by the Catholic church in the middle ages, seven lethal sins exist which ultimately result in the loss of salvation by the soul which indulges in such evils. Of the seven, pride has actually been the one which works as the driver for the remaining 6.
Pride produces in an individual a personality of xcessive self-love and the requirement to be much better than another. As soon as a person has excessive pride, she or he need to have the satisfaction of knowing they are much better and should show this “higher status” through material belongings and/or power. This has actually caused the next sin, greed. This cause and effect will continue on till the individual acknowledges his or her faults and reconciles, or until she or he has immersed themselves in the totality of wicked and suffers the consequences through death or terrible suffering.
As evidenced in this work, pride was among he aspects which assisted to create the awful plot of the story. Both King Laios and Oedipus showed the characteristics of pride. When King Laios was traveling down the path where the 3 roadways fulfilled, he and his males came across a man walking together with named Oedipus. King Laios, in his need to reveal he was more effective and of a greater status, requested his males to run Oedipus off the roadway. Oedipus was outraged by this show of egotism, and in his requirement to reveal he was not somebody who would take such an act, he reached to eliminate all but among the taking a trip party, even the king himself.
This program of pride, in the fulfillment the prediction, contributed to the downfall of the protagonist and set the phase for the plot. Guy, through the meaning of literature, is an imperfect creature who is susceptible to the temptations of the unethical. It is in man’s nature for him to err. It is also in concurrence with the very nature of the universe that he need to suffer for the actions of his errors. This brings into view the 3rd commentary about guy and his presence: that although the life of man is in itself a positive excellent, there will constantly be a shadow of horrible disaster that alls across it.
This shadow is always cast by either or both of 2 different bodies: an unconscious error devoted by a private, and/or an error devoted due to some defect in guy’s nature. In this Greek tragedy, the lead character suffered through an element of his own nature which in Greek is called hubris, or as today’s society knows it, the fatal sin of pride. His pride led him to act irrationally in the incident at the location where 3 roadways fulfilled, where he unconsciously devoted the act of regicide, and later realizes that e likewise has committed parricide, and satisfied the prediction of his fate.
Man himself is not supreme, but a delicate, mortal being who unavoidably must suffer failures in his life. As in all literature, the main objective which exhibits from each literary work uses itself to the existence of man. In the Greek disaster, Oedipus the King, 3 dissertations of humanity are displayed. These 3 are: man can not escape his past, pride is the sin which leads man to higher evils, and although the life of man is in itself a positive great, there will constantly be a hadow of terrible tragedy that falls across it.
The plot in this renowned Greek tragedy emphasizes the function of literature. With the protagonist having to suffer for the acts he committed in his past, to the flaw of pride which led him to dedicate the act, and finally, to the effects he needed to suffer due to his actions, it clearly mentions and shows how the actions of the characters in this story pertain to the common individual not of just the society of Sophocles’ time, but also to the individual of the twentieth century too.