Oedipus the King an Awful Hero
Marietta Shaw English 1302-6504 Mrs. Weatherford 21 November 2011 An Awful Hero Indeed! In Sophocles disaster Oedipus the King, King Oedipus testifies solve the murder of previous King Laios in order to free the city from the afflict. The afflict taunts the city damaging crops and livestock and making the ladies unable to bear kids. A seer, Teirsias tells Oedipus that he himself is Thebes’s pollution for killing his father and weding his mom. Oedipus overlooks his words and is blind to the fact till he finds that it is he who corrupts the city.
In order to illustrate Oedipus as the ideal Aristotelian terrible hero, the reader must examine his honorable stature that provides him authority, his hamartia leading to his downfall, and his misery that not entirely should have. Because Oedipus is the king he has the authority to require info about Laios’s death and end up being a traditional awful hero. Aristotle’s states that a tragic hero must be of either a high rank or worthy birth (“Tragedy and Funny” 1211), and Oedipus’s position as king provides him power to find and question those who understand and punishthose who withholds info about the murder.
When Oedipus is at the front of the palace before the people the Priest describes him as “terrific Oedipus, O powerful King of Thebes” (Prologue 16) when asking for help from the plague. Oedipus is extremely appreciated as king by the individuals of Thebes. He has actually succeeded by the people and the city and they are proud to have such an effective king. Aristotle likewise thinks that a tragic hero noble stature is not shown by his kingship alone but by his “nobility of mind” (“Catastrophe and Funny” 1211) and Oedipus proves his understanding to the people which made him king in the very first location.
The Priest also describes Oedipus as “a king of knowledge checked in the past can act in time of problems, and act well” (Beginning 46-47). When the city was at their most trying times Oedipus releases them and raises the curse of the Sphinx. It was then when Oedipus reveals the people his understanding being that no one was ever able to resolve the riddle of the Sphinx for that reason, making him the “noblest of males” (Prologue 48). In addition to Oedipus being a smart king falling from his throne will a lot more categorize him as the perfect Aristotelian awful hero.
According to Aristotle, he falls from “an act of injustice through ignorance” (“Disaster and Funny” 1211) and Oedipus does simply that. When he hears that he’s destined to eliminate his dad and marry his mother he leaves from his home town and falls right into his fate -he meets King Laioswho orders him off the road and eliminates him and his men (Scene II. 265-288). See here is what triggers his fall he ranges from home filled with fear and anger and disobeys the king’s orders to leave the road and when faced he act and eliminate the king.
Though Oedipus is unaware that this male is his dad and King of the ground he stands on murder is wrong and a criminal offense against the gods. Aristotle adds that the tragic hero is “personally responsible for his downfall” (“Disaster and Comedy” 1212). Oedipus admits his actions and” [pronounces] this [maledict] upon [himself] (Scene II. 294). Oedipus takes complete duty for the murder he dedicates he understands he acted alone. He recognizes that since of what he has actually done that there will be some penalty or doom to come upon him.
He is a tragic hero due to the fact that he causes his own catastrophe. Although Oedipus actions are his own fault, the repercussions he faces are overwhelming and too much to weight to bring. Aristotle says “his misery is not completely was worthy of” (“Catastrophe and Comedy” 1212) which is true in Oedipus’s case. When Oedipus hears the reality of who his biological parents are King Laios, whom he kills and his other half Iocaste, whom he marries he informs himself that he is “damned in his birth, in his marital relationship damned, damned in the blood he [sheds] with his own hands” (Scene.
IV 72-73). Oedipus is guilty of spoiling his mom and having children with her– he also eliminated his father, however he does not deserve this if he was to know that individuals he discovers are his moms and dads he would not have actually remained in the situation. Now Oedipus has to live the rest of his life in vein because he was running from something that was predestined to happen. Aristotle also thinks that the penalty goes beyond the criminal activity (“Disaster and Funny” 1212).
When Oedipus discovers his mom and wife Iocaste dead from hanging herself he takes his takes his own sight, Choragos sees Oedipus and asks “what daemon jumped on your life with heavier punishment than a mortal man can bear” (Exodos 75-77). Choragos sees the discomfort and agony the Oedipus has to endure for the rest of his life and acknowledges the reality that Oedipus is strong to have actually been through a lot.
He sees that Oedipus has wronged due to the fact that he didn’t know however he still needs to suffer the effects which is more in his eyes than a male can take. Aristotle’s theory of a terrible hero seems to have come directly from viewing Sophocles disaster Oedipus the King. Oedipus is the ideal example of an Aristotelian tragic hero. Oedipus has all of the characteristics mentioned in Aristotle’s theory he was a king who has everything and is the reason for his terrible fall.