Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: Book Analysis

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: Reserve Analysis

Frankenstein Book Analytical Action Task Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is a story of strong characters and their exploration of their own identities. The concern of the source of human identity is suggested by the picture of a produced animal that appears human. Other concerns about human identity are checked out, is a private born or made, how are they formed by nature or nurture, what makes someone a human being? These are the numerous unspoken questions about the source of life and the living of life explored in this book. The reader is delegated make his or her own conclusions.

This unique shows numerous environmental influences shaping character. Mary Shelley makes it a point to reveal the reader that people are each distinct and it matters not if they are natural born or man-made. Mary Shelley focused not on development of the synthetic animal in her story however instead selected to set the story as an interwoven tale of beings managing their own problematic physiological natures (Ozolins 103). Mary Shelley chose to produce a book that wove together components of gothic and romantic styles to produce a mental text about human nature and its possibilities.

In Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, there are several conventions utilized by the author Mary Shelley to focus the reader’s attention. A basic tone of the gothic as the supernatural is developed as an effect when intermittent uncommon scenarios are precipitated or experienced. The plot integrates strong characters, extreme areas, and unusual actions done naturally and casually. The surrounding ecological components of ice and rain contribute to the dismal environment. Phrasing of descriptions consistently enforces the tone of the unidentified, dread, and sorrow.

In Chapter 10, specific wording clarifies the character’s mood, “The rain depressed me; my old sensations recurred, and I was unpleasant” (Shelley 59). In Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, the appearance of normalcy constantly stabilizes the likelihood of situations entering unforeseen and disturbing directions. There are plot within other story lines. The reader comes across a number of special and individual narratives in this novel. The author encapsulates these stories in a story of regular life and its pursuits as a mechanism to inform a tale.

This is revealed by the letters Capt. Robert Walton writes, of Victor Frankenstein attending a standard university, of strategies to get married, in the discussions the characters have and the animal’s remarks to his maker. After the encompassing tone of realism is set, Mary Shelley includes an obvious Gothic mindset by providing the reader a tale of a male piecing together a creature and bringing it to life. The sighting of unusual figures by Captain Robert Walton on the northern ice circulation is the very first key to the reader that occasions will become more unpredictable as the story plays out.

Another time, in Chapter 1, Captain Walton observations suggest the future when revealing, “I have described myself as always having been imbued with a fervent yearning to penetrate the secrets of nature” (Shelley 42). Mary Shelley makes use of many structures as plot additives to improve the impact of this gothic plot. There is the underlying question of where the story is going because of the evident normalcy of most of the story’s actions. Then Mary Shelley interjects casually something odd into the mix. Each time she uses a gothic idea or technique, the reader is forced to view the whole plot in a different way.

When Mary Shelley blogs about the casualness of Victor starting body part searching, it deliberately adds to the supernatural style in this book. This uses a subtle tip, a glance, of the abnormal. The reader’s feeling of horror when the unique describes Victor delicately searches for body parts in the dark is timeless gothic. Victor is a seemingly typical male, however in the night, he has unusual intents revealing a lack of ethical behavior. Mary Shelley drew principles from numerous literary and philosophical resources to utilize as influences in her story.

This novel’s name is a hint to the author’s understanding as Prometheus sought to take the ultimate power of fire for human use. Both Prometheus and Victor looked for to obtain an unnatural power they did not naturally have. Mary Shelley utilized both the Bible and Milton’s Paradise Lost to expand the structure of realism in this story of the pursuit of understanding and human creation. In Chapter 15, Mary Shelley also utilized Locke’s thinking on the mindful mind and his presumptions on perception to recommend questions relative to the pursuit of knowledge when the animal discovers a bag with books in the woods.

The creature, a figure of social seclusion, mistook among these books, Milton’s Paradise Lost, for an accurate text. This wrong presumption by the animal was simply another method Mary Shelley revealed the reader the mankind of the animal (Morgan 2). Mary Shelley’s unique used strong believable characters. These characters each carry out the challenging pursuit of defining their own relationship with excellent and evil. The total impression offered by the novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is that the creature is only one of the lots of characters in the novel who seek to fix their own questions of identity and happiness.

The animal’s story of becoming human through the advancement of sensory recognition (not birth) simulates the understanding structures made use of by true human babies. The creature’s character is shown as establishing over time through direct experience closely imitating the regular human structures of experience. Mary Shelley desired the reader to see any human life as a continuous obstacle of personal choices (Morgan 6). As the animal said to Victor, “keep in mind, that I am thy creature: I ought to be thy Adam; however I am rather the fallen angel” (Shelley 93).

This mental path of private discovery leads to unexpected levels of humankind in the creature and a definitive lack of humanity in Victor Frankenstein. The un-natural birth of the creature is not a major focus in the novel. The creature’s life after birth is fascinating as the animal reveals an obvious ability to become more humanlike in time. There is a certain scary in understanding that becoming human is so simple for a creature that by meaning is not human. Mary Shelley was making the point that the nature of the living things is not always predictable (Ozolins 105).

Victor Frankenstein’s actions and reactions to the entire circumstance surrounding the creature’s presence should make the reader concern Victor’s level of humanity. Victor is the daddy and mom of the creature, yet he reacts to his own actions with an unfeeling observation, “the various mishaps of life are not so adjustable as the feelings of human nature. I had worked hard for almost 2 years, for the sole purpose of instilling life into an inanimate body” (Shelley 52). Think about that one of the least human characters in this novel is the animal’s developer, Victor Frankenstein.

Victor in Chapter 3 relates that possibility, not preference, forces his interest in certain directions, “rather the wicked influence, the Angel of Destruction, which asserted omnipotent sway over me” (Shelly 30). Victor would rather blame the impulses of fate instead of take duty for his own actions, drives, and beliefs. Victor chooses to overlook the logical and seek the supernatural. His absence of sensation and any real humankind is shown in the words he used to describe what he saw, “by the glimmer of the alf-extinguished light, I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and a convulsive movement upset its limbs” (Shelley 51). Rather of explaining the creature’s miraculous birth, he explains the action from a cold, scientific, and clinical viewpoint. His absence of humankind continues in this unique as Victor Frankenstein ultimately abandons his creature, his own child of development, and by this act develops the supreme denial of his purposefully developed family. Throughout the unique chapters, the author Mary Shelley specifically dehumanizes Victor while progressively humanizing the creature.

This makes the reader see the creature as the potential protagonist in this novel. This turnaround of traditional human functions also subconsciously suggests to the reader, that the reader must consider the philosophical principles surrounding the definition and action of birth, production, life, and death. The horror of Victor bringing to life a covered together creature does appear practically commonplace as an action in the novel, as Mary Shelley includes the concept but uses no clinical information of how Victor accomplished the animation.

Mary Shelley chose to exclude extensive information about how the animal was given life. This contributed to the secret of the production. The apparent and deliberate avoidance of scientific information was used to redirect the reader’s focus back onto the larger plot about human identity. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus informs numerous interwoven stories of human identity. It is an unique about the effects of making good and bad choices.

The novel suggests that within the character of any of us, we may pick at any time to change our moral requirements, but in doing so, we risk the repercussions of taking that action. Why do some people hold to their concepts and others so easily change them to seek individual potential gain? The unique suggests that there must be moral consequences from breaking one’s ethical requirements. Mary Shelley’s novel asks the reader to consider the question of ethical habits and ethical requirements in regards to what makes up a human identity or what makes any of us human, or more human than any other animal.

Works Cited Morgan, Monique. “Frankenstein’s Particular Events: Inductive Thinking, Narrative Technique, and Generic Classification.” Romanticism on the Net, The Gothic: from Ann Radcliffe to Anne Rice. Number 44, Nov. 2006. 14 Nov. 2012. Ozolins, Aija. “Dreams and Teachings: Dual Strands in Frankenstein,” Science Fiction Studies 2 (1975 ). 12 Nov. 2012. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus. Editor. James Rieger. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1982. Print.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar