Jack and Roger are 2 Allegorical Characters – Lord of the Flies

Lord of the Flies: Jack and Roger

Lord of The Flies: Jack and Roger Jack and Roger are 2 allegorical characters in the story: “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding. They are both identified as killers but they are very different from one another. The two young kids start with the same objectives but as the story progresses we start to see the distinctions in their personalities. While Jack’s power cravings grows, Roger’s vicious nature also grows also. The character of Jack is an obvious id, he is a power hungry callous killer that would do anything for power.

Jack is not always a killer, the events on the island lead up to his habits. For instance, when Ralph, Simon and Jack remain in the forest and they see the pig for the first time Jack does not kill it no doubt from the taboo of killing. The second time he fulfills the pig he eliminates it with his knife and this is just the beginning of the modification in his behavior. Jack’s wanting of meat develops into apparent bloodlust later on in the unique, for instance he kills the mother pig without even believing if it was wrong: “Eliminate the pig, cut her throat, slam her head in! “.

Jack’s decapitation of the dead mom pig proves that he is no longer the Jack that could not kill the pig but a lot more blood-thirsty one that only wishes to eliminate and not be rescued. Although Jack is not satanic like Roger, he loses all sense of factor, he is nevertheless a killer. Jack attempts his best to do what is best for the young boys but his power cravings in fact makes the scenario much worse: “The chief nabbed among the couple of remaining spears and poked Sam in the ribs” (P. 182) Jack’s own name has even end up being a taboo, he has practically god-like power and utilizes it for ‘wicked’.

If it were not for the rescue of the boys, Jack’s power-hunger and bloodlust would have eventually gotten them all killed. The character of Roger is also an id however he is a satanic killer. Unlike Jack Roger’s bloodlust can never be pleased. He is a brutal killer and an ideal example of this is when he eliminates Piggy with the huge rock. Roger likewise has a mind of his own, he is a totally free spirit that does not follow orders. For example, Jack never ordered him to drop the rock on Piggy, it was simply Roger that did it on his own free will. He is an ill and twisted ndividual, another example of this is the method he brutally eliminates the mother pig. He would also show no doubt to take a human life, not just does he kill Piggy but he likewise hones a stick at both ends for Ralph so he was clearly going to do to him what he did to the mother pig. Roger is simply a worse version of Jack and like Jack too control of Ralph’s power he would have taken control of Jack’s power with a much more sadistic culture then the one that Jack has actually created. Jack and Roger are both killers, another callous and power-hungry then the other.

Ralph lost his power to an individual more sadistic, what is to state that Jack will not lose his power to Roger? and who would have been next after Roger? eventually the culture would become so sadistic and callous that death would be a regular occasion. Jack and Roger are both sadistic killers and one might argue that it does not matter if you are a killer or a ruthless killer because either way you are still a killer but one can likewise argue: “Do you honestly think that the young boys would be the same is it were Roger and not Jack that became chief?

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar