Lord of the Flies: Jack and Roger

Lord of the Flies: Jack and Roger

Lord of The Flies: Jack and Roger Jack and Roger are 2 allegorical characters in the story: “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding. They are both identified as killers however they are very various from one another. The two young boys start off with the same objectives but as the story advances we begin to see the distinctions in their characters. While Jack’s power hunger grows, Roger’s vicious nature likewise grows as well. The character of Jack is an obvious id, he is a power hungry ruthless killer that would do anything for power.

Jack is not constantly a killer, the occasions on the island lead up to his habits. For instance, when Ralph, Simon and Jack are in the forest and they see the pig for the first time Jack does not kill it no doubt from the taboo of killing. The second time he fulfills the pig he eliminates it with his knife and this is only the start of the modification in his behavior. Jack’s wanting of meat becomes apparent bloodlust in the future in the unique, for example he eliminates the mother pig without even thinking if it was incorrect: “Eliminate the pig, cut her throat, slam her head in! “.

Jack’s decapitation of the dead mom pig shows that he is no longer the Jack that might not kill the pig however a far more blood-thirsty one that just wants to eliminate and not be rescued. Although Jack is not hellish like Roger, he loses all sense of reason, he is nonetheless a killer. Jack attempts his finest to do what is best for the young boys but his power hunger really makes the situation much worse: “The chief took among the few remaining spears and poked Sam in the ribs” (P. 182) Jack’s own name has even end up being a taboo, he has almost god-like power and utilizes it for ‘evil’.

If it were not for the rescue of the kids, Jack’s power-hunger and bloodlust would have eventually gotten them all killed. The character of Roger is likewise an id however he is a hellish killer. Unlike Jack Roger’s bloodlust can never be satisfied. He is a ruthless killer and an ideal example of this is when he eliminates Piggy with the huge rock. Roger likewise has a mind of his own, he is a totally free spirit that does not follow orders. For instance, Jack never purchased him to drop the rock on Piggy, it was purely Roger that did it on his own free choice. He is an ill and twisted ndividual, another example of this is the way he completely kills the mom pig. He would also show no doubt to take a human life, not only does he kill Piggy but he also hones a stick at both ends for Ralph so he was clearly going to do to him what he did to the mom pig. Roger is simply an even worse version of Jack and like Jack too control of Ralph’s power he would have taken control of Jack’s power with a lot more vicious culture then the one that Jack has actually produced. Jack and Roger are both killers, another callous and power-hungry then the other.

Ralph lost his power to an individual more vicious, what is to state that Jack will not lose his power to Roger? and who would have been next after Roger? ultimately the culture would become so sadistic and callous that death would be a routine occasion. Jack and Roger are both vicious killers and one might argue that it does not matter if you are a killer or a ruthless killer because in either case you are still a killer but one can likewise argue: “Do you truthfully believe that the boys would be the same is it were Roger and not Jack that ended up being chief?

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar