Lord Of The Flies: Contrast of Ralph and Jack
There are always individuals who, in a group, brought out much better qualities as a leader than others. The greatest individuals nevertheless, become the greater influences, which the others choose to follow. Nevertheless, often the greatest individual is not the best choice. Authors often demonstrate how humans choose this more powerful person, in order to provide an understanding of the different powers that some people can posses over others. In William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies Ralph though not the more powerful person, shows a better understanding of people which provides Ralph much better leadership qualities than Jack.
Ralph displays useful human qualities as a leader by working towards the betterment of the young boys’ society. He knows that in order to remain civilized the kids need stability and order. He develops guidelines and a simple type of federal government to achieve this order. Ralph comprehends that the boys, especially Piggy, have to be provided respect and needs to be dealt with as equals. This makes Ralph a better leader, as he is able to acknowledge that he was not remarkable to any of the other kids. Ralph’s wisdom and capability to aim to the future likewise make him a remarkable leader. Ralph has the sense to keep his concentrate on getting off the island. He demands keeping the fire burning as a call for help. Ralph’s leadership supplies peace and order to the island while Jack’s management wreaks havoc.
Under Jack’s rule, the kids become uncivilized savages. They have no discipline. Ralph, however, keeps the kids under order through the meetings, which he himself calls. At these conferences a sense of order is instilled since the young boys need to wait up until they hold the conch to speak. When Ralph says, “I’ll provide the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking.” (Golding 36) by making such guidelines as these, and by providing the boys the stability of an authority figure, primarily himself, he implements his role of leader. He wins the kids respect and self-confidence in his leadership capabilities. Ralph uses his authority to try to enhance the kids’ society.
By developing shelters he shows his knowledge of the kids’ needs. When he says to Jack, “They talk and shout. The littluns. Even some of the others.” (Golding 56) he is describing why the young boys need shelters; they hesitate. Jack stops working to realize the kids need security, stability and order in their society. Ralph understands that by developing the shelters, the young boys will feel more safe. This shows his superior knowledge of people, which makes him a better leader than Jack.
Ralph’s treatment of the kids shows his understanding of how individuals must be treated. While Jack considers the young boys inferior to himself, Ralph deals with the young boys as equates to. Ralph’s remarkable leadership qualities are reflected in his constant defence of Piggy. Piggy is the weakest of the group and is therefore treated unfairly much of the time. When Jack hits Piggy and breaks his glasses, Ralph calls it “A dirty trick.” (Golding 78) Ralph’s empathy and capability to empathize with others hence illustrating his understanding of people; while at the very same time demonstrates Jack’s neglect for other people.
Ralph’s “federal government” is a form of democracy which offers each young boy equal rights and an ability to reveal themselves. Jack treats the boys, specifically Piggy, as inferiors. When Jack gets meat from hunting, he offers everybody some other than for Piggy. When Piggy requests for some, Jack states, “You didn’t hunt.” (Golding 80) Ralph and a lot of the littluns did not hunt, yet only this treatment is directed at Piggy. Jack’s contempt for Piggy reveals his inability to understand individuals, while a good leader would look after all of his followers. Ralph has this understanding and is for that reason a much better leader.
Ralph’s good sense and ability to recognize what is finest for the group as an entire more shows his remarkable leadership abilities. His main focus throughout the book is getting rescued and he puts much focus on this. He advises the kids to make a fire and to keep it burning as a distress signal. When the kids do not share his interest for getting rescued, he ends up being exasperated. “The fire is the most crucial thing on the island. How can we ever be rescued except by luck, if we don’t keep the fire going?” (Golding 88) Ralph’s determination to get saved is not for purely selfish reasons, but rather, it remains in the very best interest of the group.
When the young boys join Jack’s tribe; Jack just pleases their short-term desires and requires, such as the desire for meat. An excellent leader nevertheless, must look to the future and strategy appropriately such as Ralph does. Although these options may not constantly be popular, the better leader will carry out long term strategies. When Piggy says “Which is much better– to be a pack of painted niggers like you are, or to be practical like Ralph is?” (Golding 199) he demonstrates how the young boys; by not following Ralph, have been lead astray by Jack. Ralph’s primary concern, is leaving the island, a much better choice for the boys to follow. Unfortunately, the kids choose to follow Jack, whose primary top priority is to hunt and play video games instead of try to be conserved. Had they listened to the much better leader, the novel might not have ended as unfortunately.
Ralph’s clear understanding of people and their requirements make him a far remarkable leader when compared to Jack. Ralph’s understanding of the kids need for stability and order through federal government and guidelines triggers him to improve the society in which they are living. Jack’s society was barbaric and savage and satisfied none of these requirements. Jack deals with the boys as slaves and inferiors.
Ralph’s patience and caring with the young boys shows his ability to take charge and rule in an efficient, yet democratic style. Ralph’s top priority to leave the island shows his wisdom and capability to make decisions. Although a good leader might not be as charismatic as a poor one, it is necessary to choose the leader who will satisfy the needs of the people. The popularity of an inferior leader quickly vanishes, yet the wisdom and guidance of an excellent leader will constantly remain.