Lord Of The Flies: Comparison of Ralph and Jack
There are constantly people who, in a group, brought out much better qualities as a leader than others. The strongest people nevertheless, become the greater impacts, which the others choose to follow. Nevertheless, in some cases the strongest individual is not the very best choice. Authors typically show how human beings choose this more powerful person, in order to offer an understanding of the different powers that some individuals can posses over others. In William Golding’s unique, Lord of the Flies Ralph though not the more powerful person, shows a much better understanding of people which gives Ralph better management qualities than Jack.
Ralph shows helpful human qualities as a leader by working towards the improvement of the kids’ society. He understands that in order to stay civilized the boys need stability and order. He develops rules and an easy kind of federal government to achieve this order. Ralph comprehends that the kids, especially Piggy, need to be given respect and should be dealt with as equals. This makes Ralph a much better leader, as he has the ability to acknowledge that he was not remarkable to any of the other boys. Ralph’s knowledge and capability to look to the future also make him a superior leader. Ralph has the sense to keep his focus on leaving the island. He demands keeping the fire burning as a call for help. Ralph’s management provides peace and order to the island while Jack’s management wreaks havoc.
Under Jack’s rule, the boys end up being uncivilized savages. They have no discipline. Ralph, nevertheless, keeps the kids under order through the meetings, which he himself calls. At these conferences a sense of order is instilled due to the fact that the kids need to wait till they hold the conch to speak. When Ralph says, “I’ll provide the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking.” (Golding 36) by making such rules as these, and by offering the kids the stability of an authority figure, primarily himself, he implements his function of leader. He wins the young boys respect and self-confidence in his management capabilities. Ralph utilizes his authority to try to enhance the kids’ society.
By building shelters he shows his knowledge of the young boys’ needs. When he states to Jack, “They talk and shriek. The littluns. Even some of the others.” (Golding 56) he is referring to why the boys need shelters; they are afraid. Jack stops working to realize the kids need security, stability and order in their society. Ralph understands that by constructing the shelters, the young boys will feel more secure. This shows his remarkable understanding of people, which makes him a much better leader than Jack.
Ralph’s treatment of the boys demonstrates his understanding of how individuals need to be treated. While Jack thinks about the young boys inferior to himself, Ralph treats the young boys as equates to. Ralph’s superior management qualities are shown in his continuous defence of Piggy. Piggy is the weakest of the group and is therefore dealt with unjustly much of the time. When Jack hits Piggy and breaks his glasses, Ralph calls it “A cheat.” (Golding 78) Ralph’s compassion and capability to empathize with others therefore illustrating his understanding of people; while at the exact same time shows Jack’s disregard for other humans.
Ralph’s “government” is a kind of democracy which gives each kid equivalent rights and a capability to reveal themselves. Jack deals with the kids, particularly Piggy, as inferiors. When Jack gets meat from searching, he offers everybody some other than for Piggy. When Piggy asks for some, Jack says, “You didn’t hunt.” (Golding 80) Ralph and a lot of the littluns did not hunt, yet just this treatment is directed at Piggy. Jack’s contempt for Piggy shows his inability to comprehend people, while an excellent leader would look after all of his followers. Ralph possesses this understanding and is therefore a better leader.
Ralph’s sound judgment and capability to acknowledge what is best for the group as a whole more shows his remarkable management skills. His main focus throughout the book is getting saved and he puts much emphasis on this. He instructs the kids to make a fire and to keep it burning as a distress signal. When the boys do not share his enthusiasm for getting saved, he ends up being exasperated. “The fire is the most essential thing on the island. How can we ever be rescued except by luck, if we don’t keep the fire going?” (Golding 88) Ralph’s decision to get rescued is not for simply self-centered factors, however rather, it is in the best interest of the group.
When the young boys join Jack’s people; Jack just pleases their short-term desires and requires, such as the desire for meat. An excellent leader however, must look to the future and strategy appropriately such as Ralph does. Although these choices may not constantly be popular, the better leader will carry out long term strategies. When Piggy says “Which is better– to be a pack of painted niggers like you are, or to be reasonable like Ralph is?” (Golding 199) he demonstrates how the kids; by not following Ralph, have been lead astray by Jack. Ralph’s main concern, is getting off the island, a much wiser choice for the boys to follow. Sadly, the young boys choose to follow Jack, whose main priority is to hunt and play games rather than try to be conserved. Had they listened to the much better leader, the novel might not have actually ended as tragically.
Ralph’s clear understanding of people and their requirements make him a far superior leader when compared to Jack. Ralph’s understanding of the kids need for stability and order through federal government and rules prompts him to improve the society in which they are living. Jack’s society was barbaric and savage and satisfied none of these needs. Jack deals with the boys as servants and inferiors.
Ralph’s persistence and caring with the boys reveals his capability to take charge and rule in a reliable, yet democratic fashion. Ralph’s top priority to leave the island shows his wisdom and capability to make choices. Although a great leader may not be as charismatic as a bad one, it is important to pick the leader who will satisfy the requirements of the people. The appeal of an inferior leader quickly vanishes, yet the wisdom and assistance of a good leader will always remain.