Blindness in Oedipus the King
Blindness plays a two-fold part in Sophocles’ disaster “Oedipus the King.” First, Sophocles presents blindness as a physical disability affecting the auger Teiresias, and later on Oedipus; but later on, blindness comes to suggest an inability to see the evil in one’s actions and the repercussions that ensue. The irony in this lies in the fact that Oedipus, while talented with sight, is blind to himself, in contrast to Teiresias, blind physically, however able to see the evil to which Oedipus has actually fallen prey to.
Tragically, as Oedipus acquires the internal gift of sight, he discards his outward gift of sight. Sight, for that reason, seems to be like good and evil, a person may only select one. Teiresias, prophet of Phoebus, came down with blindness to the real world, however, as a result, got the present of sight into the spiritual world. This fantastic present enabled him to become a superior prophet, praised by the individuals as “god like” and as an individual “in whom the reality lives. # 8221; For that reason, it was not a surprise that Oedipus asked the old prophet to come before the people to inform them regarding who or what the cause of the plague decimating their country was. What Oedipus was not anticipating, nevertheless, was that the sin he might not see himself was to blame for the judgement being poured out upon the nation. The sin so concealed from Oedipus’ and individuals’ eyes was rather noticeable to Teiresias.
What Teiresias lacked in his capability to see the world, he made up for in being able to see a person’s heart– an ability that nearly cost him his life after a prolonged argument with Oedipus. Yet what identifies Teiresias from the others was his genuine issue for others– an issue that he voiced prior to demolishing Oedipus in front of the growing crowd beyond the palace. For Teiresias, the option was basic– he picked to forego his special needs and delve much deeper into himself in order to discover a sight that exceeded his physical limitations, a sight predestined for good.
Oedipus, on the other hand, was not given such an easy decision. While gifted with an external sense of sight, he did not have the understanding of his own sinful actions– his hamartia, so to speak. Oedipus was seeing to others, but blind to himself. As he got away from Corinth, fearing a prediction he received from an oracle, Oedipus revealed total blindness to the inevitability of his fate. The murder of his dad, Laius, and the subsequent marital relationship to this mom, Jocasta, even more illuminate the level of Oedipus’ loss of sight; blind in deed, factor, and consequence.
Tragically, Oedipus’ anagnorisis occurs concurrently with his mom’s/ wife’s suicide. With a heart filled with despair and a set of newly opened eyes, Oedipus makes his improvement total as he exchanges his limited physical eyesight for the spiritual sight had by Teiresias. With this being done, Oedipus likewise seals his fate– he no longer can serve wicked, so his life needs to hange in order to serve his new master, good. The famous Sphinx was the only character that successfully possessed and maintained both kinds of sight.
He had the outside gift of sight, which he utilized in combination with his spiritual gift of sight to wreck havoc on individuals of Thebes. The Sphinx discovered that individuals, while outwardly seeing, were utterly blind to the issues right in front of them. His riddle was his effort at assisting them– though in an uncommon method- to move the focus of their eyes from outward to inward. He stabilized the power and obligation of both types of sight. Sophocles’ used this element of the Sphinx to prove that it remains in fact possible to have both kinds of sight, simply not for human beings.
The only risk in having both kinds of sight was making sure that the Sphinx served great more than he served evil, a highly objected to reality. In conclusion, the style of sight controlled Sophocles’ catastrophe “Oedipus the King.” The characters Teiresias, Oedipus, and the Sphinx were used to reveal the various types of sight– physical, spiritual, and both. General though, Sophocles used sight as an extended metaphor, in which the prevailing form of sight revealed his master– good or wicked, of which there can be only one.