Animal Farm Literary Analysis Essay
Animal Farm Literary Analysis Essay In George Orwell’s, Animal Farm, the primary source of power is said to be utilized in language and using rhetoric. Without language and the power of words, the disobedience would have never occurred and completion outcome of Napoleon’s total takeover would have never ever happened. In the story, Animal Farm, the author demonstrates the power of language as a mean of control in Old Major’s speech, the rules, and in Squealer’s explanations of Napoleon’s incorrect testaments. In Old Major’s speech, there is an ample quantity of convincing strategies being utilized in different methods.
Old Major utilizes much affecting language so the animals could have a more psychological than logical response to his speech. He utilizes powerful language to reveal to the animals that a rebellion is the best solution to their problem. In his speech he encourages the animals that Male is the response to all of their issues by specifying that, “Male is the only genuine enemy we have” (7 ). In the mind of Old Major their lives are “unpleasant, laborious, and short” (6) all due to the fact that of the selfishness of Guy. Because Guy “consumes without producing” (7) and uses the animals effort to Man’s own benefit Old Significant brings up the concept of “disobedience” (9 ).
These words have a powerful affect on the animals being that in the future they actually do rebel. The power of language as a mean of control is demonstrated in this speech because had Old Significant not made the speech, the animals would have never ever rebelled. The power of language as a mean of control is demonstrated in the seven rules due to the fact that they are a list of rules that the animals need to comply with after their disobedience. The power of language in the commandments comes from the reality that they are “unalterable laws” (24) in which the animals on Animal Farm need to live by for ever after.
With the commandments, the pigs are “lowering the principles of animalism” (24) and such words control them to be together after the rebellion. These rules inform the animals what they can or can not do: “No animal will consume alcohol” (25) which is seen as a mean of control through language. In Squealer’s description of Napoleon’s mistruths the power of language is likewise shown since in order for the animals to think him he needs to be extremely persuasive and have influential word choice. When Squealer has to describe what takes place to the milk and apples to the other animals, he declares that it is to “maintain [the pigs’] health” (35 ).
Squealer uses deceptiveness, controlling the animals to think that the pigs need these privileges. This declaration is power of language by ways of control being that he managed the animals to believe that the pigs were not benefiting from them. The animals are easily swayed by Squealer’s incorrect tales. Squealer put their minds to think that life is better on the farm by utilizing fear: “However sometimes you may make the wrong decision … suppose you had actually decided to follow Snowball, with is moonshine of windmills.” (55 ).
With all of Squealer’s explanations and incorrect testaments he was essentially managing them with making use of language and power of words. As the reader can see, the power of language is utilized throughout the story for in a generous number of reasons. Language and power is among the most essential themes in this story. It controls the animals’ habits and actions and has a lot to do with what occurs next on the farm. As mentioned in the past, Orwell shows the power of language as a mean of control in a speech, the rules, and Squealer’s descriptions to the other animals.